Find

Search Newsmax Health Search Newsmax Search Web
Newsletters Video Shop Contact Us Archives
 
Newsmax Moneynews Newsmax.TV
 
 
Headline Story  

Airport Scanner Radiation Underestimated

Thursday, July 1, 2010 8:17 AM

By Sylvia Booth Hubbard

Print this Page  

Forward Page  Forward Page

Email Us  Email Us


Scientists are warning that the radiation emitted from full-body airport scanners has been seriously underestimated and could lead to an increase in skin cancer. According to Dr. David Brenner, head of Columbia University's center for radiological research, the dose absorbed by the skin may be up to 20 times higher than previously thought.

Brenner told the Daily Mail that some groups, such as children and adults with gene mutations, are more sensitive to radiation. "The population risk has the potential to be significant," he said.

Full-body scanners use low energy beams, which concentrate most of the radiation in the skin and underlying tissue, says University of California biochemist David Argard. "While the dose would be safe if it were distributed throughout the volume of the entire body, the dose to the skin may be dangerously high," he told Digital Journal.

The most likely risk from scanners is a type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma. It is most common on the head and neck and usually occurs in people between the ages of 50 and 70. Brenner suggests not including the head and neck in scans since it would be difficult to hide weapons in those areas.

"If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future," Brenner said. "It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck."

Brenner recently told his concerns to the U.S. Congressional Biomedical Caucus, recommending they balance safety issues with health issues when flying.

Brenner was previously consulted during the writing of guidelines for the scanners, but says he would have never signed the report if he had known scanners would be used so widely.

The Civil Aviation Authority insists the scans are safe. According to the CAA, radiation from a scan is the same received during two minutes of a transatlantic flight, and it would take 5,000 scans to equal the radiation dose from a single X-ray.

© 2010 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 

 

   
   
   
       Privacy Policy  |  Terms & conditions  |  Contact Us

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action