Find

Search Newsmax Health Search Newsmax Search Web
Newsletters Health Wire Video Shop Contact Us Archives
 
Newsmax Newsmax Moneynews Newsmax.TV
 
 
Dr. Hibberd  

Removing Clots with Ultrasound

Thursday, November 3, 2011 8:05 AM

Print this Page  

Forward Page  Forward Page

Email Us  Email Us

Question: I've been diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from a weight-lifting exercise about a month ago. I neglected to treat the injury and played tennis for almost a month several hours a day before seeing a doctor. The ER doctor administered a regimen of Coumadin and Fragmin.

It's been almost four weeks, and I would like to see a vascular surgeon who can remove the clot with ultrasound and get off Coumadin. Is this possible?

Dr. Hibberd's Answer:

Removing a clot with ultrasound is almost always a wasted effort unless done in the first several hours of a deep vein thrombosis, if at all. The vein almost always restenoses (narrows) and then the clotting scenario starts all over again, as well as the risks of having a pulmonary embolism ... definitely a bad situation.

You are going to have to adjust to the Coumadin for now. If intolerable, you may have to consider an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter that is used for recurrent DVT with the risk of pulmonary embolism or for those who cannot use Coumadin. I don't believe an IVC filter would be good for you since it doesn't prevent DVT but only protects pulmonary embolism.

Your clotted vein will likely recanalize (form a new path) all by itself over the next three to six months, and you are probably wiser in remaining on closely monitored Coumadin depending upon the advice of your vascular surgeon/consultants.

© 2011 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Have a Question for Dr. Hibberd?
Ask . . . * Required
*E-mail Address:
*First Name:
Last Name:
*Postal Code:
*Question:


Sign me up for free e-mail Health Alerts from Newsmax.com

 

 

   
   
   
       Privacy Policy  |  Terms & conditions  |  Contact Us

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action